ViziBit vs Microsoft Forms
ViziBit is a European alternative to Microsoft Forms: same e-signature use case, headquartered in Croatia and governed by EU GDPR, while Microsoft Forms is based in the United States.
By the EU Alternatives team Last updated
Transform document workflows with secure digital signatures, seamless integrations, and AI-powered tools. Supports eIDAS compliance and multiple signature types.
- Jurisdiction
- EU / EEA
- Primary privacy law
- EU GDPR
- US CLOUD Act exposure
- No
- Open source
- No
- Free tier
- No
Surveys and quizzes drop straight into Excel and Teams here, which is why Microsoft 365 shops rarely look elsewhere. It costs nothing with a Microsoft account, though free forms cap out at 200 responses; higher limits require a Microsoft 365 subscription. The service runs from Redmond, meaning respondents' answers land in a US cloud subject to US disclosure law.
- Jurisdiction
- United States
- GDPR by default
- Requires DPA + TIA
- US CLOUD Act exposure
- Yes
ViziBit vs Microsoft Forms at a glance
| ViziBit | Microsoft Forms | |
|---|---|---|
| Headquarters | Croatia | United States |
| Data jurisdiction | EU / EEA | United States |
| Primary privacy law | EU GDPR | Requires DPA + transfer assessment |
| US CLOUD Act exposure | No | Yes |
| Best for | Teams that need e-signature built for European data-protection requirements | Teams already invested in the Microsoft Forms ecosystem |
Choose ViziBit if…
- You want a provider governed by a European privacy regime
- GDPR or public-sector data-protection requirements apply to you
- You'd rather back the European tech ecosystem
Stick with Microsoft Forms if…
- You depend on integrations only available in the Microsoft Forms ecosystem
- Your organisation has no EU data-residency constraints
- Migration costs outweigh the jurisdiction benefits for now
Why choose ViziBit over Microsoft Forms?
The decisive argument is data jurisdiction. Microsoft Forms is headquartered in the United States, which means personal data processed through it can be subject to non-EU legal regimes: the US CLOUD Act, FISA 702, or similar laws depending on the provider. After the 2020 Schrems II ruling, EU organisations must carry out a transfer impact assessment for every such data flow.
ViziBit removes that overhead. As a Croatia-based provider, it operates under EU GDPR, and data stays inside the EU/EEA by default. For regulated sectors such as health, public administration, and finance, that's not a nice-to-have but a requirement. For everyone else, it's concentration-risk insurance: you avoid depending on a single jurisdiction that can change the rules without warning.