WorkFlex vs Remote
WorkFlex is a European alternative to Remote — same hr & recruitment use case, built under EU data-protection law.
By the EU Alternatives team Last updated
- Jurisdiction
- EU / EEA
- GDPR by default
- Yes
- US CLOUD Act exposure
- No
- Open source
- No
- Free tier
- No
Remote — a non-EU product.
- Jurisdiction
- US
- GDPR by default
- Requires DPA + TIA
- US CLOUD Act exposure
- Yes
About WorkFlex
WorkFlex automates the compliance paperwork behind international business travel, workations, and cross-border assignments — generating A1 certificates, posted worker notifications, and visa documentation in minutes rather than weeks. Used by 500+ enterprises including Deel, BioNTech, Otto Group, and Flix, it handles more than 100,000 trips annually and turns a fragmented mess of tax, social security, and immigration rules into one automated workflow for HR and Global Mobility teams.
The platform runs pre-trip compliance assessments covering work entitlement, tax, social security, and labour law across 25+ countries, files Posted Worker Notifications automatically for EU/EEA destinations, and manages visa applications end-to-end. Integrated travel health insurance through ALH Group Hallesche, 24/7 SOS support, and a full audit trail close the loop, backed by €250K financial liability coverage for social security and tax risks.
Key benefits:
- Automated A1 certificates and Certificates of Coverage across 25+ countries
- Posted Worker Notifications auto-filed for EU/EEA business trips
- Visa handling including document prep and submission
- Risk monitoring with 24/7 SOS emergency support
- Full audit trail of trips, approvals, and compliance documents
- €250K liability coverage for social security and tax risks
WorkFlex is headquartered in Amsterdam, Netherlands, founded in 2022 by Pieter Manden and Patrick Koch, and recently raised €37 million in Series B funding from Spectrum Equity. The platform is ISO 27001 certified, aligned with ISO 31030 risk standards, and fully GDPR compliant with data transfer impact assessments — making it a European-built answer to cross-border compliance rather than a US-rooted mobility tool.
Why choose WorkFlex over Remote?
The decisive argument is data jurisdiction. Remote is headquartered in US, which means personal data processed through it can be subject to non-EU legal regimes — the US CLOUD Act, FISA 702, or similar laws depending on the provider. After the 2020 Schrems II ruling, EU organisations must carry out a transfer impact assessment for every such data flow.
WorkFlex removes that overhead. As a Netherlands-based provider, it operates natively under GDPR, and data stays inside the EU/EEA by default. For regulated sectors — health, public administration, finance — that's not a nice-to-have but a requirement. For everyone else, it's concentration-risk insurance: you avoid depending on a single non-EU jurisdiction that can change the rules without warning.