Head-to-head · 2026

Surfe vs Lusha

Surfe is a European alternative to Lusha: same crm & marketing use case, headquartered in France and operating under GDPR by default, while Lusha is based in the United States.

By the EU Alternatives team Last updated

European alternative
Surfe logo
Surfe
France

Advanced prospecting platform with waterfall enrichment, verified emails & phones, native CRM integration. Build pipelines in minutes with 90% find rates.

Jurisdiction
EU / EEA
GDPR by default
Yes
US CLOUD Act exposure
No
Open source
No
Free tier
No
See full Surfe profile
Non-EU
Lusha logo
Lusha
Lusha · US

A curated collection of the best European alternatives to Lusha.

Jurisdiction
US
GDPR by default
Requires DPA + TIA
US CLOUD Act exposure
Yes
All European alternatives to Lusha

Surfe vs Lusha at a glance

Surfe Lusha
Headquarters France US
Data jurisdiction EU / EEA US law applies
GDPR by default Yes Requires DPA + transfer assessment
US CLOUD Act exposure No Yes
Open source No
Free tier No
Best for Teams that need crm & marketing with EU data residency Teams already invested in the Lusha ecosystem

Choose Surfe if…

  • You want your data to stay under EU law without extra legal paperwork
  • GDPR compliance or public-sector requirements apply to you
  • You'd rather back the European tech ecosystem

Stick with Lusha if…

  • You depend on integrations only available in the Lusha ecosystem
  • Your organisation has no EU data-residency constraints
  • Migration costs outweigh the jurisdiction benefits for now

Why choose Surfe over Lusha?

The decisive argument is data jurisdiction. Lusha is headquartered in US, which means personal data processed through it can be subject to non-EU legal regimes: the US CLOUD Act, FISA 702, or similar laws depending on the provider. After the 2020 Schrems II ruling, EU organisations must carry out a transfer impact assessment for every such data flow.

Surfe removes that overhead. As a France-based provider, it operates natively under GDPR, and data stays inside the EU/EEA by default. For regulated sectors such as health, public administration, and finance, that's not a nice-to-have but a requirement. For everyone else, it's concentration-risk insurance: you avoid depending on a single non-EU jurisdiction that can change the rules without warning.

Frequently asked questions

Is Surfe a good alternative to Lusha?
Yes. Surfe is one of the top-ranked European alternatives to Lusha in our directory, covering the same crm & marketing use case. It is headquartered in France, keeping your data under EU law by default.
What's the main difference between Surfe and Lusha?
The biggest difference is jurisdiction: Surfe is based in France and operates under GDPR and EU data-protection law, while Lusha is headquartered in US and may transfer data outside the EU. For regulated industries or organisations following Schrems II guidance, this difference is decisive.
Is Surfe GDPR-compliant?
Surfe is a European company based in France, so GDPR compliance is the default operating model rather than a bolt-on. No transfer impact assessment is required for EU customers, unlike when using Lusha.
How do I migrate from Lusha to Surfe?
Start by exporting your data from Lusha (most providers offer an export in their settings). Then import into Surfe using its native import tool or migration guide. Running both in parallel for a week catches any feature or workflow gaps before you fully switch.

Other European alternatives to Lusha