Surfe vs Lusha
Surfe is a European alternative to Lusha: same crm & marketing use case, headquartered in France and governed by EU GDPR, while Lusha is based in Israel.
By the EU Alternatives team Last updated
Advanced prospecting platform with waterfall enrichment, verified emails & phones, native CRM integration. Build pipelines in minutes with 90% find rates.
- Jurisdiction
- EU / EEA
- Primary privacy law
- EU GDPR
- US CLOUD Act exposure
- No
- Open source
- No
- Free tier
- No
The browser extension that surfaces direct dials and work emails while you sit on a LinkedIn profile, and those phone numbers are what sales teams say they cannot replace. Free accounts get 40 credits a month, Starter is 49.90 dollars, and a single phone reveal burns ten credits. Lusha Systems Ltd. is Israeli, registered in Tel Aviv, and its database is built from contacts other users contributed.
- Jurisdiction
- Israel
- GDPR by default
- Requires DPA + TIA
- US CLOUD Act exposure
- Possible
Surfe vs Lusha at a glance
| Surfe | Lusha | |
|---|---|---|
| Headquarters | France | Israel |
| Data jurisdiction | EU / EEA | Israel |
| Primary privacy law | EU GDPR | Requires DPA + transfer assessment |
| US CLOUD Act exposure | No | Possible |
| Best for | Teams that need crm & marketing built for European data-protection requirements | Teams already invested in the Lusha ecosystem |
Choose Surfe if…
- You want a provider governed by a European privacy regime
- GDPR or public-sector data-protection requirements apply to you
- You'd rather back the European tech ecosystem
Stick with Lusha if…
- You depend on integrations only available in the Lusha ecosystem
- Your organisation has no EU data-residency constraints
- Migration costs outweigh the jurisdiction benefits for now
Why choose Surfe over Lusha?
The decisive argument is data jurisdiction. Lusha is headquartered in Israel, which means personal data processed through it can be subject to non-EU legal regimes: the US CLOUD Act, FISA 702, or similar laws depending on the provider. After the 2020 Schrems II ruling, EU organisations must carry out a transfer impact assessment for every such data flow.
Surfe removes that overhead. As a France-based provider, it operates under EU GDPR, and data stays inside the EU/EEA by default. For regulated sectors such as health, public administration, and finance, that's not a nice-to-have but a requirement. For everyone else, it's concentration-risk insurance: you avoid depending on a single jurisdiction that can change the rules without warning.