Mapy.com vs Strava
Mapy.com is a European alternative to Strava: same use case, headquartered in Czech Republic and governed by EU GDPR, while Strava (Strava, Inc.) is based in the United States.
By the EU Alternatives team Last updated
Explore detailed world maps, find hiking and cycling trails, and plan routes for any journey. Offers comprehensive mapping for cities and towns globally.
- Jurisdiction
- EU / EEA
- Primary privacy law
- EU GDPR
- US CLOUD Act exposure
- No
- Open source
- No
- Free tier
- No
Strava is a US-based activity-tracking and social fitness network for runners and cyclists, recording GPS routes, segments, and performance stats.
- Jurisdiction
- United States
- GDPR by default
- Requires DPA + TIA
- US CLOUD Act exposure
- Yes
Mapy.com vs Strava at a glance
| Mapy.com | Strava | |
|---|---|---|
| Headquarters | Czech Republic | United States |
| Data jurisdiction | EU / EEA | United States |
| Primary privacy law | EU GDPR | Requires DPA + transfer assessment |
| US CLOUD Act exposure | No | Yes |
| Best for | Teams that need this built for European data-protection requirements | Teams already invested in the Strava, Inc. ecosystem |
Choose Mapy.com if…
- You want a provider governed by a European privacy regime
- GDPR or public-sector data-protection requirements apply to you
- You'd rather back the European tech ecosystem
Stick with Strava if…
- You depend on integrations only available in the Strava, Inc. ecosystem
- Your organisation has no EU data-residency constraints
- Migration costs outweigh the jurisdiction benefits for now
Why choose Mapy.com over Strava?
The decisive argument is data jurisdiction. Strava is headquartered in the United States, which means personal data processed through it can be subject to non-EU legal regimes: the US CLOUD Act, FISA 702, or similar laws depending on the provider. After the 2020 Schrems II ruling, EU organisations must carry out a transfer impact assessment for every such data flow.
Mapy.com removes that overhead. As a Czech Republic-based provider, it operates under EU GDPR, and data stays inside the EU/EEA by default. For regulated sectors such as health, public administration, and finance, that's not a nice-to-have but a requirement. For everyone else, it's concentration-risk insurance: you avoid depending on a single jurisdiction that can change the rules without warning.