Mapy.com vs Strava
Mapy.com is a European alternative to Strava: same other use case, headquartered in Czech Republic and operating under GDPR by default, while Strava (Strava, Inc.) is based in the United States.
By the EU Alternatives team Last updated
Explore detailed world maps, find hiking and cycling trails, and plan routes for any journey. Offers comprehensive mapping for cities and towns globally.
- Jurisdiction
- EU / EEA
- GDPR by default
- Yes
- US CLOUD Act exposure
- No
- Open source
- No
- Free tier
- No
Strava is a US-based activity-tracking and social fitness network for runners and cyclists, recording GPS routes, segments, and performance stats.
- Jurisdiction
- US
- GDPR by default
- Requires DPA + TIA
- US CLOUD Act exposure
- Yes
Mapy.com vs Strava at a glance
| Mapy.com | Strava | |
|---|---|---|
| Headquarters | Czech Republic | US |
| Data jurisdiction | EU / EEA | US law applies |
| GDPR by default | Yes | Requires DPA + transfer assessment |
| US CLOUD Act exposure | No | Yes |
| Open source | No | — |
| Free tier | No | — |
| Best for | Teams that need other with EU data residency | Teams already invested in the Strava, Inc. ecosystem |
Choose Mapy.com if…
- You want your data to stay under EU law without extra legal paperwork
- GDPR compliance or public-sector requirements apply to you
- You'd rather back the European tech ecosystem
Stick with Strava if…
- You depend on integrations only available in the Strava, Inc. ecosystem
- Your organisation has no EU data-residency constraints
- Migration costs outweigh the jurisdiction benefits for now
Why choose Mapy.com over Strava?
The decisive argument is data jurisdiction. Strava is headquartered in US, which means personal data processed through it can be subject to non-EU legal regimes: the US CLOUD Act, FISA 702, or similar laws depending on the provider. After the 2020 Schrems II ruling, EU organisations must carry out a transfer impact assessment for every such data flow.
Mapy.com removes that overhead. As a Czech Republic-based provider, it operates natively under GDPR, and data stays inside the EU/EEA by default. For regulated sectors such as health, public administration, and finance, that's not a nice-to-have but a requirement. For everyone else, it's concentration-risk insurance: you avoid depending on a single non-EU jurisdiction that can change the rules without warning.