Head-to-head · 2026

Cap vs Loom

Cap is a European alternative to Loom: same content & media use case, headquartered in United Kingdom and governed by UK GDPR, while Loom (Atlassian) is based in the United States.

By the EU Alternatives team Last updated

European alternative
Cap logo
Cap
United Kingdom

Record beautiful screen videos with instant sharing or local editing. Cross-platform app with custom S3 support, AI features, and privacy controls.

Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Primary privacy law
UK GDPR
US CLOUD Act exposure
No
Open source
Yes
Free tier
No
Non-EU
Loom logo
Loom
Atlassian · United States

Records your screen and face and hands back a link that plays instantly, with transcripts and time-stamped comments, and plenty of teams swapped status meetings for it. The free Starter plan stops at 25 videos per person and five minutes each; Business costs 18 dollars per user monthly. Owner Atlassian reincorporated from England to Delaware in 2022, putting it under US law.

Jurisdiction
United States
GDPR by default
Requires DPA + TIA
US CLOUD Act exposure
Yes
All European alternatives to Loom

Cap vs Loom at a glance

Cap Loom
Headquarters United Kingdom United States
Data jurisdiction United Kingdom United States
Primary privacy law UK GDPR Requires DPA + transfer assessment
US CLOUD Act exposure No Yes
Best for Teams that need content & media built for European data-protection requirements Teams already invested in the Atlassian ecosystem

Choose Cap if…

  • You want a provider governed by a European privacy regime
  • GDPR or public-sector data-protection requirements apply to you
  • Open-source code and self-hosting matter to you
  • You'd rather back the European tech ecosystem

Stick with Loom if…

  • You depend on integrations only available in the Atlassian ecosystem
  • Your organisation has no EU data-residency constraints
  • Migration costs outweigh the jurisdiction benefits for now

About Cap

Cap is a beautiful, open-source screen recorder that lets creators and engineering teams capture screen and webcam in 4K, edit locally, and share instantly through short links, while keeping full ownership of the raw files and hosting. It positions itself as a privacy-respecting Loom and Camtasia alternative for people who want their recordings to stay under their control.

The app ships with three recording modes: Instant for quick Loom-style share links, Studio for timeline editing with backgrounds, padding, rounded corners, and annotations, and screenshot capture for stills. AI features auto-generate titles, summaries, chapters, and transcripts, while custom S3 buckets and custom domains let teams host recordings on their own infrastructure.

Key benefits:

  • Open-source core on GitHub gives full transparency and community contributions
  • 4K/60fps recording with intelligent compression keeps file sizes manageable
  • Custom S3 and domains let teams host videos on their own storage and brand
  • Local, cloud, or self-hosted storage options fit any privacy requirement
  • AI titles, summaries, chapters extract structure from every recording automatically
  • Native apps for macOS and Windows with Apple Silicon optimisation

Cap is developed in the United Kingdom with GDPR-aligned data handling and an option to host recordings entirely on customer-owned storage, keeping data out of US cloud jurisdiction. Self-hosted deployments give complete sovereignty over video assets and viewer analytics.

Ideal for engineers, support teams, and content creators who want a polished screen recorder with local-first storage, open-source transparency, and a clean alternative to proprietary tools like Loom and Camtasia.

Why choose Cap over Loom?

The decisive argument is data jurisdiction. Loom is headquartered in the United States, which means personal data processed through it can be subject to non-EU legal regimes: the US CLOUD Act, FISA 702, or similar laws depending on the provider. After the 2020 Schrems II ruling, EU organisations must carry out a transfer impact assessment for every such data flow.

Cap removes that overhead. As a United Kingdom-based provider, it operates under UK GDPR, and data stays in the United Kingdom, which the European Commission recognises as offering an adequate level of protection. For regulated sectors such as health, public administration, and finance, that's not a nice-to-have but a requirement. For everyone else, it's concentration-risk insurance: you avoid depending on a single jurisdiction that can change the rules without warning.

Frequently asked questions

Is Cap a good alternative to Loom?
Yes. Cap is one of the top-ranked European alternatives to Loom in our directory, covering the same content & media use case. It is headquartered in United Kingdom, where UK GDPR applies.
What's the main difference between Cap and Loom?
The biggest difference is jurisdiction: Cap is based in United Kingdom, where UK GDPR applies, while Loom is headquartered in the United States and may transfer data outside Europe. For regulated industries or organisations following Schrems II guidance, this difference is decisive.
Is Cap GDPR-compliant?
Cap is based in United Kingdom, where UK GDPR applies. EU customers should still verify the provider's hosting and subprocessors, but the service is designed for European data-protection requirements.
How do I migrate from Loom to Cap?
Start by exporting your data from Loom (most providers offer an export in their settings). Then import into Cap using its native import tool or migration guide. Running both in parallel for a week catches any feature or workflow gaps before you fully switch.

Other European alternatives to Loom