Head-to-head · 2026

ZITADEL vs Okta

ZITADEL is a European alternative to Okta — same security & identity use case, built under EU data-protection law.

By the EU Alternatives team Last updated

European alternative
ZITADEL logo
ZITADEL
Switzerland

Manage user identities securely with customizable authentication, SSO, MFA, and RBAC. Offers easy APIs, programmable workflows, and multi-tenancy for developers.

Jurisdiction
EU / EEA
GDPR by default
Yes
US CLOUD Act exposure
No
Open source
Yes
Free tier
No
See full ZITADEL profile
Non-EU
Okta logo
Okta
Okta · US

Okta by Okta.

Jurisdiction
US
GDPR by default
Requires DPA + TIA
US CLOUD Act exposure
Yes
All European alternatives to Okta

About ZITADEL

ZITADEL is an open-source identity infrastructure platform that combines the flexibility of self-hosting with the convenience of a managed cloud — bridging enterprise authentication and developer-friendly APIs in a single product.

The platform handles the full identity lifecycle: login pages, social logins, SSO, MFA, passkeys, RBAC, machine identities, and multi-tenancy — all configurable through gRPC and REST APIs. ZITADEL Actions let teams run custom workflows after any auth event without writing a custom server.

Key features:

  • Authentication — hosted login UI, social logins, passkeys, MFA, and SSO
  • Authorization — role-based access control with fine-grained permission management
  • Multi-tenancy — add new organisations, delegate admin rights, and isolate data per tenant
  • Machine identities — service accounts and API key management for non-human actors
  • Extensible — ZITADEL Actions execute serverside logic after any auth event
  • APIs — modern gRPC and REST, with SDKs for Go, Angular, React, Next.js, Flutter, and Python
  • Compliance — OpenID certified, ISO 27001, GDPR, and SOC 2 Type II

Open source with 4,000+ GitHub stars and 50+ contributors. Deploy to your own infrastructure or use ZITADEL Cloud with EU data residency.

Why choose ZITADEL over Okta?

The decisive argument is data jurisdiction. Okta is headquartered in US, which means personal data processed through it can be subject to non-EU legal regimes — the US CLOUD Act, FISA 702, or similar laws depending on the provider. After the 2020 Schrems II ruling, EU organisations must carry out a transfer impact assessment for every such data flow.

ZITADEL removes that overhead. As a Switzerland-based provider, it operates natively under GDPR, and data stays inside the EU/EEA by default. For regulated sectors — health, public administration, finance — that's not a nice-to-have but a requirement. For everyone else, it's concentration-risk insurance: you avoid depending on a single non-EU jurisdiction that can change the rules without warning.

Frequently asked questions

Is ZITADEL a good alternative to Okta?
Yes — ZITADEL is one of the top-ranked European alternatives to Okta in our directory, covering the same security & identity use case. It is headquartered in Switzerland, keeping your data under EU law by default.
What's the main difference between ZITADEL and Okta?
The biggest difference is jurisdiction: ZITADEL is based in Switzerland and operates under GDPR and EU data-protection law, while Okta is headquartered in US and may transfer data outside the EU. For regulated industries or organisations following Schrems II guidance, this difference is decisive.
Is ZITADEL GDPR-compliant?
ZITADEL is a European company based in Switzerland, so GDPR compliance is the default operating model — not a bolt-on. No transfer impact assessment is required for EU customers, unlike when using Okta.
How do I migrate from Okta to ZITADEL?
Start by exporting your data from Okta (most providers offer an export in their settings). Then import into ZITADEL using its native import tool or migration guide. Running both in parallel for a week catches any feature or workflow gaps before you fully switch.

Other European alternatives to Okta