TimeCamp vs Clockify
TimeCamp is a European alternative to Clockify: same project management & productivity use case, headquartered in Poland and governed by EU GDPR, while Clockify is based in the United States.
By the EU Alternatives team Last updated
Boost productivity with automated time tracking, project management, and precise billing. Accurately track work hours, manage attendance, and improve team efficiency.
- Jurisdiction
- EU / EEA
- Primary privacy law
- EU GDPR
- US CLOUD Act exposure
- No
- Open source
- No
- Free tier
- No
Time tracking with a timer, timesheet grid, calendar view and reports that most small teams find sufficient without training anyone. The catch is a free plan capped at five users, with Basic at 3.99 dollars per seat a month rising to 11.99 dollars for Enterprise. CAKE.com Inc. is in Palo Alto and applies California law even to European customers.
- Jurisdiction
- United States
- GDPR by default
- Requires DPA + TIA
- US CLOUD Act exposure
- Yes
TimeCamp vs Clockify at a glance
| TimeCamp | Clockify | |
|---|---|---|
| Headquarters | Poland | United States |
| Data jurisdiction | EU / EEA | United States |
| Primary privacy law | EU GDPR | Requires DPA + transfer assessment |
| US CLOUD Act exposure | No | Yes |
| Best for | Teams that need project management & productivity built for European data-protection requirements | Teams already invested in the Clockify ecosystem |
Choose TimeCamp if…
- You want a provider governed by a European privacy regime
- GDPR or public-sector data-protection requirements apply to you
- You'd rather back the European tech ecosystem
Stick with Clockify if…
- You depend on integrations only available in the Clockify ecosystem
- Your organisation has no EU data-residency constraints
- Migration costs outweigh the jurisdiction benefits for now
Why choose TimeCamp over Clockify?
The decisive argument is data jurisdiction. Clockify is headquartered in the United States, which means personal data processed through it can be subject to non-EU legal regimes: the US CLOUD Act, FISA 702, or similar laws depending on the provider. After the 2020 Schrems II ruling, EU organisations must carry out a transfer impact assessment for every such data flow.
TimeCamp removes that overhead. As a Poland-based provider, it operates under EU GDPR, and data stays inside the EU/EEA by default. For regulated sectors such as health, public administration, and finance, that's not a nice-to-have but a requirement. For everyone else, it's concentration-risk insurance: you avoid depending on a single jurisdiction that can change the rules without warning.