Head-to-head · 2026

TimeCamp vs Clockify

TimeCamp is a European alternative to Clockify: same project management & productivity use case, headquartered in Poland and governed by EU GDPR, while Clockify is based in the United States.

By the EU Alternatives team Last updated 7 August 2026

European alternative

TimeCamp

Poland

Boost productivity with automated time tracking, project management, and precise billing. Accurately track work hours, manage attendance, and improve team efficiency.

Jurisdiction: EU / EEA
Primary privacy law: EU GDPR
US CLOUD Act exposure: No
Open source: No
Free tier: No

Visit TimeCamp Full profile

Non-EU

Clockify

Clockify · United States

Time tracking with a timer, timesheet grid, calendar view and reports that most small teams find sufficient without training anyone. The catch is a free plan capped at five users, with Basic at 3.99 dollars per seat a month rising to 11.99 dollars for Enterprise. CAKE.com Inc. is in Palo Alto and applies California law even to European customers.

Jurisdiction: United States
GDPR by default: Requires DPA + TIA
US CLOUD Act exposure: Yes

All European alternatives to Clockify

TimeCamp vs Clockify at a glance

	TimeCamp	Clockify
Headquarters	Poland	United States
Data jurisdiction	EU / EEA	United States
Primary privacy law	EU GDPR	Requires DPA + transfer assessment
US CLOUD Act exposure	No	Yes
Best for	Teams that need project management & productivity built for European data-protection requirements	Teams already invested in the Clockify ecosystem

Choose TimeCamp if…

You want a provider governed by a European privacy regime
GDPR or public-sector data-protection requirements apply to you
You'd rather back the European tech ecosystem

Stick with Clockify if…

You depend on integrations only available in the Clockify ecosystem
Your organisation has no EU data-residency constraints
Migration costs outweigh the jurisdiction benefits for now

Why choose TimeCamp over Clockify?

The decisive argument is data jurisdiction. Clockify is headquartered in the United States, which means personal data processed through it can be subject to non-EU legal regimes: the US CLOUD Act, FISA 702, or similar laws depending on the provider. After the 2020 Schrems II ruling, EU organisations must carry out a transfer impact assessment for every such data flow.

TimeCamp removes that overhead. As a Poland-based provider, it operates under EU GDPR, and data stays inside the EU/EEA by default. For regulated sectors such as health, public administration, and finance, that's not a nice-to-have but a requirement. For everyone else, it's concentration-risk insurance: you avoid depending on a single jurisdiction that can change the rules without warning.

Frequently asked questions

Is TimeCamp a good alternative to Clockify?

Yes. TimeCamp is one of the top-ranked European alternatives to Clockify in our directory, covering the same project management & productivity use case. It is headquartered in Poland, where EU GDPR applies.

What's the main difference between TimeCamp and Clockify?

The biggest difference is jurisdiction: TimeCamp is based in Poland, where EU GDPR applies, while Clockify is headquartered in the United States and may transfer data outside Europe. For regulated industries or organisations following Schrems II guidance, this difference is decisive.

Is TimeCamp GDPR-compliant?

TimeCamp is based in Poland, where EU GDPR applies. EU customers should still verify the provider's hosting and subprocessors, but the service is designed for European data-protection requirements.

How do I migrate from Clockify to TimeCamp?

Start by exporting your data from Clockify (most providers offer an export in their settings). Then import into TimeCamp using its native import tool or migration guide. Running both in parallel for a week catches any feature or workflow gaps before you fully switch.

Other European alternatives to Clockify