Simply vs Bluehost
Simply is a European alternative to Bluehost — same cloud & hosting use case, built under EU data-protection law.
By the EU Alternatives team Last updated
Danish hosting and domain registrar with 200,000+ customers and 11-minute support response — free SSL, daily backups, WordPress-optimised, and part of team.blue.
- Jurisdiction
- EU / EEA
- GDPR by default
- Yes
- US CLOUD Act exposure
- No
- Open source
- No
- Free tier
- No
Bluehost by Newfold.
- Jurisdiction
- US
- GDPR by default
- Requires DPA + TIA
- US CLOUD Act exposure
- Yes
About Simply
Simply.com is a Danish web hosting and domain registrar founded in 2004, now part of the team.blue group — Europe's largest web hosting collective. With 200,000+ customers across Denmark and beyond, Simply.com bundles domain registration, web hosting, email, and WordPress tools behind a simple pricing model and famously fast support (11-minute average response).
The product focuses on accessibility — technical enough for developers, simple enough for first-time website builders. Free SSL, daily backups, and DDoS protection are included on every hosting plan.
Key features:
- Domain registration — .dk, .fr, .eu, .com, .org, and major ccTLDs
- Web hosting — three tiers from €0.49/month (Basic) to €3/month (Pro)
- WordPress & WooCommerce hosting — optimised stacks with OPcache
- Email hosting — personal email on your domain
- Website builder — no-code site creation
- SSH access and PHP OPcache on all plans
- 99.99% uptime guarantee with free SSL and DDoS protection
- Integrated add-ons — OnPay payment gateway, SimplyBook booking, iubenda consent
Backed by the team.blue group (which operates multiple European hosting brands), Simply.com is a solid GDPR-native alternative to GoDaddy and Namecheap for European small businesses and WordPress sites.
Why choose Simply over Bluehost?
The decisive argument is data jurisdiction. Bluehost is headquartered in US, which means personal data processed through it can be subject to non-EU legal regimes — the US CLOUD Act, FISA 702, or similar laws depending on the provider. After the 2020 Schrems II ruling, EU organisations must carry out a transfer impact assessment for every such data flow.
Simply removes that overhead. As a Denmark-based provider, it operates natively under GDPR, and data stays inside the EU/EEA by default. For regulated sectors — health, public administration, finance — that's not a nice-to-have but a requirement. For everyone else, it's concentration-risk insurance: you avoid depending on a single non-EU jurisdiction that can change the rules without warning.