Reverso vs Grammarly
Reverso is a European alternative to Grammarly: same search & internet use case, headquartered in France and governed by EU GDPR, while Grammarly (Superhuman Platform) is based in the United States.
By the EU Alternatives team Last updated
AI translation, grammar check, dictionaries, pronunciation, and verb conjugation across 25+ languages. Translate documents while keeping layout.
- Jurisdiction
- EU / EEA
- Primary privacy law
- EU GDPR
- US CLOUD Act exposure
- No
- Open source
- No
- Free tier
- No
Corrections appear wherever you type, in the browser, in desktop apps and on the phone keyboard, and that ubiquity is the habit people find hardest to give up. The free tier handles basic grammar, Pro is 12 euros a month and Enterprise is quote-only. The company renamed itself Superhuman Platform Inc. of San Francisco after absorbing Superhuman and Coda, so drafts are processed under US law.
- Jurisdiction
- United States
- GDPR by default
- Requires DPA + TIA
- US CLOUD Act exposure
- Yes
Reverso vs Grammarly at a glance
| Reverso | Grammarly | |
|---|---|---|
| Headquarters | France | United States |
| Data jurisdiction | EU / EEA | United States |
| Primary privacy law | EU GDPR | Requires DPA + transfer assessment |
| US CLOUD Act exposure | No | Yes |
| Best for | Teams that need search & internet built for European data-protection requirements | Teams already invested in the Superhuman Platform ecosystem |
Choose Reverso if…
- You want a provider governed by a European privacy regime
- GDPR or public-sector data-protection requirements apply to you
- You'd rather back the European tech ecosystem
Stick with Grammarly if…
- You depend on integrations only available in the Superhuman Platform ecosystem
- Your organisation has no EU data-residency constraints
- Migration costs outweigh the jurisdiction benefits for now
Why choose Reverso over Grammarly?
The decisive argument is data jurisdiction. Grammarly is headquartered in the United States, which means personal data processed through it can be subject to non-EU legal regimes: the US CLOUD Act, FISA 702, or similar laws depending on the provider. After the 2020 Schrems II ruling, EU organisations must carry out a transfer impact assessment for every such data flow.
Reverso removes that overhead. As a France-based provider, it operates under EU GDPR, and data stays inside the EU/EEA by default. For regulated sectors such as health, public administration, and finance, that's not a nice-to-have but a requirement. For everyone else, it's concentration-risk insurance: you avoid depending on a single jurisdiction that can change the rules without warning.