Head-to-head · 2026

Moosend vs Campaign Monitor

Moosend is a European alternative to Campaign Monitor: same crm & marketing use case, headquartered in Greece and governed by EU GDPR, while Campaign Monitor is based in the United States.

By the EU Alternatives team Last updated 7 August 2026

European alternative

Moosend

Greece

Complete email marketing platform featuring A/B testing, automation workflows, landing pages, and advanced analytics. Trusted by 100,000+ businesses worldwide.

Jurisdiction: EU / EEA
Primary privacy law: EU GDPR
US CLOUD Act exposure: No
Open source: No
Free tier: No

Visit Moosend Full profile

Non-EU

Campaign Monitor

Campaign Monitor · United States

An email marketing veteran with polished templates and a drag-and-drop editor agencies still rate. Plans start at 13 dollars a month for 500 contacts and climb steeply as lists grow. It now sits inside Marigold of Nashville, Tennessee, a group that sold most of its sibling brands to Zeta Global in late 2025, so subscriber lists sit with a US owner in visible flux.

Jurisdiction: United States
GDPR by default: Requires DPA + TIA
US CLOUD Act exposure: Yes

All European alternatives to Campaign Monitor

Moosend vs Campaign Monitor at a glance

	Moosend	Campaign Monitor
Headquarters	Greece	United States
Data jurisdiction	EU / EEA	United States
Primary privacy law	EU GDPR	Requires DPA + transfer assessment
US CLOUD Act exposure	No	Yes
Best for	Teams that need crm & marketing built for European data-protection requirements	Teams already invested in the Campaign Monitor ecosystem

Choose Moosend if…

You want a provider governed by a European privacy regime
GDPR or public-sector data-protection requirements apply to you
You'd rather back the European tech ecosystem

Stick with Campaign Monitor if…

You depend on integrations only available in the Campaign Monitor ecosystem
Your organisation has no EU data-residency constraints
Migration costs outweigh the jurisdiction benefits for now

Why choose Moosend over Campaign Monitor?

The decisive argument is data jurisdiction. Campaign Monitor is headquartered in the United States, which means personal data processed through it can be subject to non-EU legal regimes: the US CLOUD Act, FISA 702, or similar laws depending on the provider. After the 2020 Schrems II ruling, EU organisations must carry out a transfer impact assessment for every such data flow.

Moosend removes that overhead. As a Greece-based provider, it operates under EU GDPR, and data stays inside the EU/EEA by default. For regulated sectors such as health, public administration, and finance, that's not a nice-to-have but a requirement. For everyone else, it's concentration-risk insurance: you avoid depending on a single jurisdiction that can change the rules without warning.

Frequently asked questions

Is Moosend a good alternative to Campaign Monitor?

Yes. Moosend is one of the top-ranked European alternatives to Campaign Monitor in our directory, covering the same crm & marketing use case. It is headquartered in Greece, where EU GDPR applies.

What's the main difference between Moosend and Campaign Monitor?

The biggest difference is jurisdiction: Moosend is based in Greece, where EU GDPR applies, while Campaign Monitor is headquartered in the United States and may transfer data outside Europe. For regulated industries or organisations following Schrems II guidance, this difference is decisive.

Is Moosend GDPR-compliant?

Moosend is based in Greece, where EU GDPR applies. EU customers should still verify the provider's hosting and subprocessors, but the service is designed for European data-protection requirements.

How do I migrate from Campaign Monitor to Moosend?

Start by exporting your data from Campaign Monitor (most providers offer an export in their settings). Then import into Moosend using its native import tool or migration guide. Running both in parallel for a week catches any feature or workflow gaps before you fully switch.

Other European alternatives to Campaign Monitor

Notifuse

vs Campaign Monitor