Hyperping vs Uptime Kuma
Hyperping is a European alternative to Uptime Kuma: same uptime monitoring use case, headquartered in France and governed by EU GDPR, while Uptime Kuma (Louis Lam (open source)) is based in Hong Kong.
By the EU Alternatives team Last updated
Monitor websites & APIs with 24 check types from 19 regions. Get instant alerts via email, Slack, SMS. Create public/private status pages. GDPR compliant.
- Jurisdiction
- EU / EEA
- Primary privacy law
- EU GDPR
- US CLOUD Act exposure
- No
- Open source
- No
- Free tier
- Yes
Self-hosted open-source uptime monitor with checks for websites, APIs, TCP ports, DNS records and Docker containers, over 90 notification channels and built-in status pages. It is free under the MIT licence; you provide your own server. The project is maintained by Hong Kong developer Louis Lam.
- Jurisdiction
- Hong Kong
- GDPR by default
- Requires DPA + TIA
- US CLOUD Act exposure
- Possible
Hyperping vs Uptime Kuma at a glance
| Hyperping | Uptime Kuma | |
|---|---|---|
| Headquarters | France | Hong Kong |
| Data jurisdiction | EU / EEA | Hong Kong |
| Primary privacy law | EU GDPR | Requires DPA + transfer assessment |
| US CLOUD Act exposure | No | Possible |
| Best for | Teams that need uptime monitoring built for European data-protection requirements | Teams already invested in the Louis Lam (open source) ecosystem |
Choose Hyperping if…
- You want a provider governed by a European privacy regime
- GDPR or public-sector data-protection requirements apply to you
- You want to start free and scale up later
- You'd rather back the European tech ecosystem
Stick with Uptime Kuma if…
- You depend on integrations only available in the Louis Lam (open source) ecosystem
- Your organisation has no EU data-residency constraints
- Migration costs outweigh the jurisdiction benefits for now
About Hyperping
Hyperping combines uptime monitoring, status pages, and incident management into one platform so you never race against customer-reported outages. 30-second checks from 18 global locations catch real issues before customers notice, with multi-location verification eliminating false positives so every alert deserves your attention.
The platform goes beyond simple HTTP pings with 24 check types covering HTTPS, SSL certificates, TCP ports, cron jobs, E2E browser flows via Playwright, and API endpoints. When something breaks, on-call rotations and escalation policies route alerts through Slack, SMS, phone, PagerDuty, OpsGenie, and webhooks, while password-protected status pages keep customers and internal teams informed.
Key benefits:
- Multi-location verification eliminates false positives from any single bad region
- Unlimited status pages with custom domains, SSO, and subscriber updates included
- E2E browser checks run Playwright scripts to verify critical user flows end-to-end
- Built-in on-call with rotations and escalations replaces a separate PagerDuty subscription
- SAML SSO and priority support on the Team plan for larger organizations
- Open-source integrations for Terraform, Python, Prometheus, and Go via community tooling
- Flat-rate pricing consolidates the Pingdom + Statuspage + PagerDuty stack at a fraction of the cost
Based in France and GDPR-compliant by design, Hyperping is a direct European alternative to Atlassian's Statuspage, Datadog, and PagerDuty for teams that want to avoid US-based monitoring vendors and their compliance overhead.
Trusted by companies of all sizes, from startups on the free tier to enterprises consolidating their legacy Pingdom, Statuspage, and PagerDuty subscriptions, with a 14-day free trial and no credit card required to get started.
Why choose Hyperping over Uptime Kuma?
The decisive argument is data jurisdiction. Uptime Kuma is headquartered in Hong Kong, which means personal data processed through it can be subject to non-EU legal regimes: the US CLOUD Act, FISA 702, or similar laws depending on the provider. After the 2020 Schrems II ruling, EU organisations must carry out a transfer impact assessment for every such data flow.
Hyperping removes that overhead. As a France-based provider, it operates under EU GDPR, and data stays inside the EU/EEA by default. For regulated sectors such as health, public administration, and finance, that's not a nice-to-have but a requirement. For everyone else, it's concentration-risk insurance: you avoid depending on a single jurisdiction that can change the rules without warning.