Head-to-head · 2026

HARICA vs DigiCert

HARICA is a European alternative to DigiCert: same security & identity use case, headquartered in Greece and governed by EU GDPR, while DigiCert is based in the United States.

By the EU Alternatives team Last updated 7 August 2026

European alternative

HARICA

Greece

Jurisdiction: EU / EEA
Primary privacy law: EU GDPR
US CLOUD Act exposure: No
Open source: No
Free tier: No

Visit HARICA Full profile

Non-EU

DigiCert

DigiCert · United States

One of the largest commercial certificate authorities, selling OV and EV certificates alongside the lifecycle tooling large estates need so an expired cert never takes a site down. Nothing here is free: a basic OV certificate lists at 218 dollars a year, against zero for Let's Encrypt. The company sits in Lehi, Utah, under US private equity owners Clearlake Capital and TA Associates.

Jurisdiction: United States
GDPR by default: Requires DPA + TIA
US CLOUD Act exposure: Yes

All European alternatives to DigiCert

HARICA vs DigiCert at a glance

	HARICA	DigiCert
Headquarters	Greece	United States
Data jurisdiction	EU / EEA	United States
Primary privacy law	EU GDPR	Requires DPA + transfer assessment
US CLOUD Act exposure	No	Yes
Best for	Teams that need security & identity built for European data-protection requirements	Teams already invested in the DigiCert ecosystem

Choose HARICA if…

You want a provider governed by a European privacy regime
GDPR or public-sector data-protection requirements apply to you
You'd rather back the European tech ecosystem

Stick with DigiCert if…

You depend on integrations only available in the DigiCert ecosystem
Your organisation has no EU data-residency constraints
Migration costs outweigh the jurisdiction benefits for now

Why choose HARICA over DigiCert?

The decisive argument is data jurisdiction. DigiCert is headquartered in the United States, which means personal data processed through it can be subject to non-EU legal regimes: the US CLOUD Act, FISA 702, or similar laws depending on the provider. After the 2020 Schrems II ruling, EU organisations must carry out a transfer impact assessment for every such data flow.

HARICA removes that overhead. As a Greece-based provider, it operates under EU GDPR, and data stays inside the EU/EEA by default. For regulated sectors such as health, public administration, and finance, that's not a nice-to-have but a requirement. For everyone else, it's concentration-risk insurance: you avoid depending on a single jurisdiction that can change the rules without warning.

Frequently asked questions

Is HARICA a good alternative to DigiCert?

Yes. HARICA is one of the top-ranked European alternatives to DigiCert in our directory, covering the same security & identity use case. It is headquartered in Greece, where EU GDPR applies.

What's the main difference between HARICA and DigiCert?

The biggest difference is jurisdiction: HARICA is based in Greece, where EU GDPR applies, while DigiCert is headquartered in the United States and may transfer data outside Europe. For regulated industries or organisations following Schrems II guidance, this difference is decisive.

Is HARICA GDPR-compliant?

HARICA is based in Greece, where EU GDPR applies. EU customers should still verify the provider's hosting and subprocessors, but the service is designed for European data-protection requirements.

How do I migrate from DigiCert to HARICA?

Start by exporting your data from DigiCert (most providers offer an export in their settings). Then import into HARICA using its native import tool or migration guide. Running both in parallel for a week catches any feature or workflow gaps before you fully switch.

Other European alternatives to DigiCert