e24cloud vs Backblaze B2
e24cloud is a European alternative to Backblaze B2: same cloud & hosting use case, headquartered in Poland and governed by EU GDPR, while Backblaze B2 (Backblaze) is based in the United States.
By the EU Alternatives team Last updated
First public cloud in Poland offering flexible IaaS solutions with certified data centers, high availability architecture, and compliance with NIS2 and DORA requirements.
- Jurisdiction
- EU / EEA
- Primary privacy law
- EU GDPR
- US CLOUD Act exposure
- No
- Open source
- No
- Free tier
- No
Object storage at 6.95 dollars per terabyte a month, with egress free up to three times what you store, is what made off-site backups affordable for small teams, and the S3-compatible API means most tools already speak it. An EU Central region keeps bytes in Amsterdam, though the region is fixed when you open the account and Backblaze itself is a NASDAQ-listed company in San Francisco.
- Jurisdiction
- United States
- GDPR by default
- Requires DPA + TIA
- US CLOUD Act exposure
- Yes
e24cloud vs Backblaze B2 at a glance
| e24cloud | Backblaze B2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Headquarters | Poland | United States |
| Data jurisdiction | EU / EEA | United States |
| Primary privacy law | EU GDPR | Requires DPA + transfer assessment |
| US CLOUD Act exposure | No | Yes |
| Best for | Teams that need cloud & hosting built for European data-protection requirements | Teams already invested in the Backblaze ecosystem |
Choose e24cloud if…
- You want a provider governed by a European privacy regime
- GDPR or public-sector data-protection requirements apply to you
- You'd rather back the European tech ecosystem
Stick with Backblaze B2 if…
- You depend on integrations only available in the Backblaze ecosystem
- Your organisation has no EU data-residency constraints
- Migration costs outweigh the jurisdiction benefits for now
Why choose e24cloud over Backblaze B2?
The decisive argument is data jurisdiction. Backblaze B2 is headquartered in the United States, which means personal data processed through it can be subject to non-EU legal regimes: the US CLOUD Act, FISA 702, or similar laws depending on the provider. After the 2020 Schrems II ruling, EU organisations must carry out a transfer impact assessment for every such data flow.
e24cloud removes that overhead. As a Poland-based provider, it operates under EU GDPR, and data stays inside the EU/EEA by default. For regulated sectors such as health, public administration, and finance, that's not a nice-to-have but a requirement. For everyone else, it's concentration-risk insurance: you avoid depending on a single jurisdiction that can change the rules without warning.