Clearhaus vs First Data
Clearhaus is a European alternative to First Data: same payments & finance use case, headquartered in Denmark and governed by EU GDPR, while First Data (Fiserv) is based in the United States.
By the EU Alternatives team Last updated
- Jurisdiction
- EU / EEA
- Primary privacy law
- EU GDPR
- US CLOUD Act exposure
- No
- Open source
- No
- Free tier
- No
First Data ceased to exist as a company in 2019, absorbed into Fiserv in a 22 billion dollar deal; the brand now survives mostly on legacy terminals and contracts. What merchants actually get today is Fiserv's card-acquiring stack, sold on negotiated pricing with no public rate card. Fiserv is publicly listed in the US and run from Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
- Jurisdiction
- United States
- GDPR by default
- Requires DPA + TIA
- US CLOUD Act exposure
- Yes
Clearhaus vs First Data at a glance
| Clearhaus | First Data | |
|---|---|---|
| Headquarters | Denmark | United States |
| Data jurisdiction | EU / EEA | United States |
| Primary privacy law | EU GDPR | Requires DPA + transfer assessment |
| US CLOUD Act exposure | No | Yes |
| Best for | Teams that need payments & finance built for European data-protection requirements | Teams already invested in the Fiserv ecosystem |
Choose Clearhaus if…
- You want a provider governed by a European privacy regime
- GDPR or public-sector data-protection requirements apply to you
- You'd rather back the European tech ecosystem
Stick with First Data if…
- You depend on integrations only available in the Fiserv ecosystem
- Your organisation has no EU data-residency constraints
- Migration costs outweigh the jurisdiction benefits for now
Why choose Clearhaus over First Data?
The decisive argument is data jurisdiction. First Data is headquartered in the United States, which means personal data processed through it can be subject to non-EU legal regimes: the US CLOUD Act, FISA 702, or similar laws depending on the provider. After the 2020 Schrems II ruling, EU organisations must carry out a transfer impact assessment for every such data flow.
Clearhaus removes that overhead. As a Denmark-based provider, it operates under EU GDPR, and data stays inside the EU/EEA by default. For regulated sectors such as health, public administration, and finance, that's not a nice-to-have but a requirement. For everyone else, it's concentration-risk insurance: you avoid depending on a single jurisdiction that can change the rules without warning.