CDN77 vs Fastly
CDN77 is a European alternative to Fastly: same cdn & ddos protection use case, headquartered in United Kingdom and governed by UK GDPR, while Fastly is based in the United States.
By the EU Alternatives team Last updated
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Primary privacy law
- UK GDPR
- US CLOUD Act exposure
- No
- Open source
- No
- Free tier
- No
Engineers pick it for near-instant cache purging and for pushing real logic to the edge, which is hard to reproduce on a simpler CDN. There is a genuine free allowance of 100 GB and one million requests a month, then 0.12 dollars per GB across Europe and North America, while committed packages start at 1,500 dollars a month. Fastly Inc. is a San Francisco company listed on the NYSE.
- Jurisdiction
- United States
- GDPR by default
- Requires DPA + TIA
- US CLOUD Act exposure
- Yes
CDN77 vs Fastly at a glance
| CDN77 | Fastly | |
|---|---|---|
| Headquarters | United Kingdom | United States |
| Data jurisdiction | United Kingdom | United States |
| Primary privacy law | UK GDPR | Requires DPA + transfer assessment |
| US CLOUD Act exposure | No | Yes |
| Best for | Teams that need cdn & ddos protection built for European data-protection requirements | Teams already invested in the Fastly ecosystem |
Choose CDN77 if…
- You want a provider governed by a European privacy regime
- GDPR or public-sector data-protection requirements apply to you
- You'd rather back the European tech ecosystem
Stick with Fastly if…
- You depend on integrations only available in the Fastly ecosystem
- Your organisation has no EU data-residency constraints
- Migration costs outweigh the jurisdiction benefits for now
Why choose CDN77 over Fastly?
The decisive argument is data jurisdiction. Fastly is headquartered in the United States, which means personal data processed through it can be subject to non-EU legal regimes: the US CLOUD Act, FISA 702, or similar laws depending on the provider. After the 2020 Schrems II ruling, EU organisations must carry out a transfer impact assessment for every such data flow.
CDN77 removes that overhead. As a United Kingdom-based provider, it operates under UK GDPR, and data stays in the United Kingdom, which the European Commission recognises as offering an adequate level of protection. For regulated sectors such as health, public administration, and finance, that's not a nice-to-have but a requirement. For everyone else, it's concentration-risk insurance: you avoid depending on a single jurisdiction that can change the rules without warning.