Bunny Fonts vs Google Fonts
Bunny Fonts is a European alternative to Google Fonts — same content & media use case, built under EU data-protection law.
By the EU Alternatives team Last updated
Discover and implement web fonts quickly with a GDPR-compliant solution. Explore a vast library with advanced filters and live previews for optimal typography.
- Jurisdiction
- EU / EEA
- GDPR by default
- Yes
- US CLOUD Act exposure
- No
- Open source
- No
- Free tier
- No
Google Fonts — a non-EU product.
- Jurisdiction
- US
- GDPR by default
- Requires DPA + TIA
- US CLOUD Act exposure
- Yes
Why choose Bunny Fonts over Google Fonts?
The decisive argument is data jurisdiction. Google Fonts is headquartered in US, which means personal data processed through it can be subject to non-EU legal regimes — the US CLOUD Act, FISA 702, or similar laws depending on the provider. After the 2020 Schrems II ruling, EU organisations must carry out a transfer impact assessment for every such data flow.
Bunny Fonts removes that overhead. As a Slovenia-based provider, it operates natively under GDPR, and data stays inside the EU/EEA by default. For regulated sectors — health, public administration, finance — that's not a nice-to-have but a requirement. For everyone else, it's concentration-risk insurance: you avoid depending on a single non-EU jurisdiction that can change the rules without warning.